A debate on affirmative action in higher education and why it should be put to an end

Turn this argument Pro. This racial gap is cause for serious concern—but the socioeconomic gap is three times larger.

Affirmative Action

Therefore, as part of its affirmative action program, a contractor monitors and examines its employment decisions and compensation systems to evaluate the impact of those systems on women and minorities. Unknown to many, affirmative action is not forced upon school of higher education.

Numerical goals do not create guarantees for specific groups or preferences, nor are they designed to achieve proportional representation or equal results. The ability to interact with other nationalities and races should be part of the education process, which can alleviate problems experienced by many students who live very segregated lives.

Moreover, in remanding the case to the lower court, the Court held that the University must show that such a classification is "necessary.

Download Not surprisingly, the American public remains highly skeptical of efforts to count race as a factor in admissions to colleges and universities. Contracting businesses Regarding private businesses that contract with the federal government, the Supreme Court held in Fullilove v.

By setting lower hiring or school admission standards, the level of accountability is also lowered. They are more likely to be influenced to accept this student to better the diversity of the school. History and Key Court Cases Current affirmative-action policy stems from policies developed to improve and regulate diversity in the broader workplace.

Download Federal Public Policy Supports: Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's lead opinion declared: In all, only 15 percent of Michigan students are eligible for federal Pell Grants, compared with more than 25 percent at public flagship universities nationally.

Education researcher Alexandria Walton Radford and College Board economist Jessica Howell note that 43 percent of students who are academically qualified to gain admission to selective colleges undermatch, and that many are Hispanic and African American.

That would drop to 5 percent if test scores were the sole basis of admissions.

Affirmative Action

Further, it discriminated against black applicants who, due to a history of inadequate education in racially segregated schools, would more likely fail the test than their white counterparts. In a letter to his freelance editor for the book, King explained the politics of including working-class whites: Inopponents of affirmative action succeeded in passing an anti-preference initiative in Washington State.

Cross-apply the Pro case; look at it analogically. Inthe Department of Education changed its methodology for categorizing students by race and ethnicity, requiring colleges to report separately students who are members of two or more races.

He also believed that compensating blacks and other minority groups for past discrimination with hiring quotas, numerical goals, and timetables, ought to be eliminated.

The higher education establishment has joined with business leaders and civil rights groups to flood the Supreme Court in the latest challenge to racial preferences with almost 70 amicus briefs defending the status quo, as opposed to 14 calling for change.

First, a lack of racial diversity is more visible to the naked eye than a lack of socioeconomic diversity and as such draws more attention. At the same time, however, in an opinion written by Justice Powell, it ruled that race could lawfully be considered as one of several factors in making admissions decisions.

In Paradise, the Court upheld a one-for-one promotion requirement i. Their achievements are too often demeaned by other people who believe they got their positions through preferential treatment.

About Affirmative Action, Diversity and Inclusion

Ball overviews how the Supreme Court, the White House, the Department of Justice, and other special-interest groups were torn asunder by the issues Bakke presented.

As a result, minority groups would then work harder to earn respect. Under the current admissions system, which heavily weights the race of students but not their socioeconomic disadvantage, students from the richest quarter of the population outnumber students from the most disadvantaged quarter by fourteen to one at selective colleges and universities.

Minorities and Majorities Interact In Schools: While both agreed that universities may use race-based affirmative action practices for admissions, they could not agree on the fundamental reasons to account for them.

Second, it is may be easier for minority groups to politically organize around racial and ethnic identities than economically disadvantaged families to do so around economic status when seeking representation.

Placement goals also are used to measure progress toward achieving equal employment opportunity. The choice is not between racial preferences or nothing. No requirement exists that any specific position be filled by a person of a particular race, gender or ethnicity.Based on its current set-up, Affirmative Action has put race as the dominant factor in employee recruitment and school admission procedures, where it is believed that the best people for certain positions should be put there, regardless of color and race.

3. It can still reinforce stereotypes and racism. discrimination. Furthermore, affirmative action unfairly rewards minorities on the elToneous notion that a minority status automatically equates "disadvantage." In conclusion, an additional perspective for the case against implementing affirmative action policy within the workplace and in.

Moreover, affirmative action programs are condescending to the underrepresented groups since it is implied that the groups need affirmative action in order to succeed in higher education. States should focus on other policies or programs that encourage equal opportunity, such as setting high expectations for all students and improving their.

Affirmative action today has taken universities beyond the stage of “non-discrimination” on the basis of caste, class, creed, gender, ethnicity or socio-economic status, to ”positive discrimination” or ”reverse discrimination” in order to provide access to the vast.

Also, does affirmative action constitute reverse discrimination because it is unfair to whites? Decades after the introduction of race-based preferences in America, the affirmative action debate continues.

Discover the pros and cons of the practice and who benefits from it most in college admissions. Readers debate the merits of affirmative action following the December oral arguments in Fisher v. University of Texas (which ended in a ruling upholding AA in June ). Contribute your own views via [email protected]

A debate on affirmative action in higher education and why it should be put to an end
Rated 3/5 based on 100 review